[erlang-questions] OTP-9649 and further changes

Jon Watte jwatte@REDACTED
Wed Jan 18 18:49:47 CET 2012

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Gleb Peregud <gleber.p@REDACTED> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 18:40, Jon Watte <jwatte@REDACTED> wrote:
> > Will "fun M:F/A" survive reloads and old code purge, and behave like the
> > tuple function?
> AFAIK, yes

That is fantastic news!

Now, if we could get "bound args" in there somehow too...  :-)
Actually, I guess you can do that, with parameterized modules.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120118/4c6c658a/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list