[erlang-questions] OTP-9649 and further changes

[Jon Watte]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Gleb Peregud <gleber.p@REDACTED> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 18:40, Jon Watte <jwatte@REDACTED> wrote:
> > Will "fun M:F/A" survive reloads and old code purge, and behave like the
> > tuple function?
>
> AFAIK, yes
>


That is fantastic news!

Now, if we could get "bound args" in there somehow too...  :-)
Actually, I guess you can do that, with parameterized modules.

Sincerely,

jw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120118/4c6c658a/attachment.htm>