[erlang-questions] Erlang Process Notation?
Fri Dec 14 10:59:57 CET 2012
OPM looks promising. Thank you for sharing!
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Torben Hoffmann <torben.lehoff@REDACTED>wrote:
> Hi Max,
> You might want to have a look at Object Process Methodology:
> The thing that makes OPM stand out is that it makes both objects and
> processes (not the same meaning as in Erlang) first class citizens. This
> allows for a very natural description of how data is processed and where
> the functionality should be located.
> I use it as a way to depict the high level architecture and data flow more
> than anything else. It is sufficiently light weight to be done and
> maintained and expressive enough to have conversations about what is going
> If you want to model an Erlang process with OPM it would come out as an
> object (sounds weird, but stay with me) that exhibits a number of processes
> (where a process is an API function of the process).
> I have not tried the tool that has been developed for OPM - I made my own
> stencil for Dia.
> Other nice features of OPM:
> - there is a 1-to-1 mapping between the graphical representation and
> its textual one.
> - you can zoom in and out in your model - not seen with UML or
> anything else.
> But you would have to get the OPM tool or write some tool yourself to get
> the most out of these things.
> On 2012-12-14 08:51, Max Bourinov wrote:
> Hi Erlangers,
> I am wondering if there is any notation for Erlang processes? I want to
> use it to describe my systems visually. Something like UML class diagrams
> but for Erlang (I know that class diagram is not the best example).
> p.s.: I heavily use sequence diagrams and they help a lot.
> Best regards,
> erlang-questions mailing listerlang-questions@REDACTED://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> -- http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions