[erlang-questions] Split Cowboy's acceptor and HTTP code
Tim Watson
watson.timothy@REDACTED
Tue Apr 3 17:10:34 CEST 2012
+1 for splitting it out. I'm definitely one of those wanting to use
the acceptor code stand alone.
On 3 April 2012 14:46, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
> Cowboy *will* be split in two eventually. It has always been the intent. The
> only question is when.
>
> I'm not a fan of monolithic architectures. :)
>
>
> On 04/03/2012 03:35 PM, Max Lapshin wrote:
>>
>> Loic. I think that splitting cowboy into two repositories is a bad idea.
>>
>> It will make your life a nightmare if you need git bisect This is
>> exactly why erlyvideo is monolitic in single repo.
>>
>> Just keep your http code in separate subfolder src/http. This is really
>> enough.
>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> Erlang Cowboy
> Nine Nines
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list