[erlang-questions] Erlang SMTP Client?
Tue Oct 11 15:52:20 CEST 2011
On 10/11/11 5:31 AM, Robert Raschke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Ahmed Al-Saadi
> <thaterlangguy@REDACTED <mailto:thaterlangguy@REDACTED>> wrote:
> On 10/10/11 5:30 PM, David Mercer wrote:
> On Monday, October 10, 2011, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> ... I must admit, I am surprised
> there is no SMTP client in the standard distribution. You
> would think that
> would be a fairly common communication protocol...
> You will be more surprised to find (almost) no Unicode support in
> the standard distribution!
> Dealing with Unicode is highly application dependent.
> I would say that the majority of code dealing with strings transports
> them from one place to another, and then binaries and the unicode
> module are excellent! And for reasonable string manipulation a list of
> code points (or UTF-8 binaries) are all you will need for a long time.
> If you require a deeper understanding of Unicode code points,
> combining forms, and their visual representations (e.g., when
> implementing an editor), then you've got a ton more problems. And
> those are hard problems with more corner cases that you would ever
> wish for.
> Apologies for veering off topic, and probably coming across a wee bit
> too harsh,
I meant to point out that Erlang does not have a Unicode string as a
first-class citizen that the standard library generally uses as the
standard input/output. However, I should mention that I find treating
strings as a list of codepoints (or encoding bytes) to be elegant (read:
more general, less magical). Coming from a Python background, I was
surprised (read: confused) by how Erlang dealt with strings. On the plus
side, I prefer its "closer-to-the-metal" approach to dealing with text
and encoding, especially when I have extra brain-power to spend on
understanding how things work ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions