[erlang-questions] Erlang code loading

[Max Bourinov]

About the process data it is absolutely clean how Erlang handles it. I just
want some clarification about the code.


Best regards,
Max




2011/11/21 CGS <cgsmcmlxxv@REDACTED>

> **
> One instance per process, one memory allocation per process (even if it is
> the same code running). Erlang has no explicit knowledge of beam shared
> objects as far as I know. If somebody knows differently, please, correct me.
>
> CGS
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/21/2011 12:40 PM, Max Bourinov wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply! But in Erlang processes, not threads. There are
> some differences between them...
>
>
>
> Отправлено с iPhone
>
> 21.11.2011, в 15:05, CGS <cgsmcmlxxv@REDACTED> написал(а):
>
>   Hi, Max,
>
> Not an expert, but I think the memory is multiplied by the number of
> threads. Meaning, you start with an initial heap for that thread and add to
> that the states and other internal variables (repeat that for all the
> threads). At least that I noticed from my codes by now. If I am wrong, I
> apologize.
>
> Cheers,
> CGS
>
>
>
>
> On 11/21/2011 11:57 AM, Max Bourinov wrote:
>
> Hi Erlangers,
>
>  I am wondering how my Erlang app would behave in this case:
>
>  I have a lot identical processes (the same module, state of couse is
> different in each process). The module that I swap many times has a huge
> function. I want to clarify how much memory it will take? It will take
> memory for that huge function in each process or only once?
>
>  I believe it will take memory only once, but I want to make sure.
>
> Best regards,
> Max
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing listerlang-questions@REDACTED://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20111121/1f361db6/attachment.htm>