[erlang-questions] What's the most efficient method to broadcast a message to multiple (100Ks) of processes?

Eric Newhuis (personal) enewhuis@REDACTED
Fri May 13 06:48:53 CEST 2011

Um, are your processes in the same Erlang node (OS process) or are they distributed?  Are they distributed on the same network segment or over the internet?  What kinf of ping times do you get from the worst-case host?

If distributed then the only correct answer is to use hardware multicast and write your own binary packet readers.  ;-)  Or maybe there is already some library for that.  Hm.  I recall gen_tcp or something perhaps setup as an IP multicast reader/writer.  Memory doesn't serve me well from a life I led over 15 years ago.

Seriously if you really do have 100,000 clients then you may need to say something about message size, frequency, bursting, etc., before this could be better answered.  Also I worry about Erlang's networking kernel sending heartbeats over the net.  Is this all local or are we talking internets?

On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Zvi wrote:

> Hi,
> what's the most efficient method to broadcast a message to multiple
> (100Ks) of processes?
> The most naive way is:
>   [ Pid ! Msg || Pid<-Pids ].
> less naive method:
>   [ spawn(fun() -> [Pid ! Msg || Pid<-PidsSublist] end) ||
> PidsSublist <- partition(Pids, N) ].
> where partition(L,N) splits list L into N sublists.
> Any ideas for better method?
> thanks,
> Zvi
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-questions-unsubscribe@REDACTED

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list