[erlang-questions] trouble with erlang or erlang is a ghetto

Alex Arnon alex.arnon@REDACTED
Fri Jul 29 23:27:53 CEST 2011

I had built a rather basic prototype that uses a jnode running a JDBC proxy.
This approach would increase latency, but provide access to every RDBMS
under the sun.

I think that what is truly missing is an agreed-upon, standard EDBC API
definition. IMHO one that is based on JDBC could certainly be good enough.
Once that is in place, implementation is just a detail :)
Erlang Community, time to claim your place in the Enterprise!!!! :)

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Tim Watson <watson.timothy@REDACTED>wrote:

> On 29 July 2011 02:19, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1@REDACTED> wrote:
> > It should be possible to make a nice interface that is parsed transformed
> > into optimized code based on the used engine in a config file or
> something.
> >
> That's exactly what I have in mind. In fact, I was thinking of doing
> this for a logging API first of all (so you can choose between
> log4erl, error_logger, lager, etc) and then pulling out the common
> configuration and code generation features into a library/tool and
> reusing that to build a database connectivity API. I'll post an update
> if I actually get around to it! :)
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110730/8a8e3fec/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list