[erlang-questions] Funargs: Ruby-like blocks for Erlang
Thu Jul 21 21:13:27 CEST 2011
> SRFI-26 in Scheme-land). But I do agree the notation is heavier than
> it could be. A more convenient notation would encourage people to use
> anonymous functions more.
Interestingly, Haskellers are encouraged not to over-do anonymous
functions is possible. This is probably because using sections and
point-free style is more concise and arguably easier to follow.
Currying and decent support for function composition would come way
higher on my list of "want to have" stuff.
More information about the erlang-questions