[erlang-questions] Suggestions for easy to use super stable lightweight http server?
Wed Dec 21 18:46:17 CET 2011
That statement was not about misultin but about our approach in general.
Please, don't take it personaly. Actually I like API of misultin.
We will use webmachie only because we have experience with it. So, if
something will go wrong in one place something similar should be expected
everywhere and if everything is alright there are much less chances that
something will go wrong because of less code involved in the service
delivery process. This is what I believe in.
So, I promise if there are any problems with web interface in my project,
misultin will be the man and I will write about in this mail list.
Sent from my iPhone
On 21.12.2011, at 21:26, Roberto Ostinelli <roberto@REDACTED> wrote:
misultin author here. misultin has *never* broken backwards compatibility.
can you please support such a harsh statement with an example on how
upgrading "broke your entire code"? that might be helpful.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Heinz N. Gies <heinz@REDACTED> wrote:
> I can double that,
> cowboy is pretty stable, the changes in the file were AFAIK only
> improvements to the interface that extended the functionality not change
> it. Also that said I was using misultin before (admitedly a pretty old
> version like 6 month old) and updating broke my entire code to a point
> where migrating was less effort.
erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions