[erlang-questions] Web Frameworks: which to choose?

[Kenny Stone]

Why not fold in the enhancements from zotonic the framework into nitrogen
and keep zotonic just the CMS part?  I'm not criticizing, just curious :)

Kenny

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Marc Worrell <marc@REDACTED> wrote:

> We call Zotonic a CMS because you can have a full fledged with 'only'
> template work.
> We call it a framework because it is easy to extend, overrule and change
> behaviour, templates etc.
>
> At the start we just wanted a framework, but as almost everybody needs
> news, agenda, homepage and an editorial interface we ended up with a
> framework that includes a CMS to handle such things.
>
> You can still skip most of it and just use the framework parts when you
> don't like the word 'CMS'.
>
> - Marc
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 17:59 , Kenny Stone wrote:
>
> Zotonic bills itself as a CMS, which has always seemed pretty different
> from a web framework to me.
>
> Kenny
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110418/9f4850a1/attachment.htm>