[erlang-questions] Confusing about gproc with global properties

[Gregory Haskins]

On 4/18/11 12:01 PM, Ulf Wiger wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for noticing. I was about to push a new version anyway, so I
> fixed that issue as well.

Cool, thanks!

> 
> Try the latest version: https://github.com/esl/gproc/tree/v0.2.0
> 

I confirmed that it does appear to now use [g,l] by default.  Note I am
also seeing this issue:

(gproctest@REDACTED)3> gproc:reg({p, g, foo}, bar).
true
(gproctest@REDACTED)4> gproc:reg({p, l, foo}, bar).
true
(gproctest@REDACTED)5> qlc:e(qlc:q([P || P <- gproc:table(props)])).
** exception error: no function clause matching gproc:type({'_',p})
     in function  gproc:pattern/2
     in call from gproc:select/3
     in call from gproc:'-table/2-fun-2-'/3
     in call from qlc:collect/1
     in call from qlc:eval/2
(gproctest@REDACTED)6> qlc:e(qlc:q([P || P <- gproc:table({all, props})])).
** exception error: no function clause matching gproc:type({'_',p})
     in function  gproc:pattern/2
     in call from gproc:select/3
     in call from gproc:'-table/2-fun-2-'/3
     in call from qlc:collect/1
     in call from qlc:eval/2

Could be "pilot error", too ;)  Am I doing something unsupported?

-Greg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 267 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110418/c12e164e/attachment.bin>