[erlang-questions] non-trivial supervisor idioms? -- An open-source plea!

Attila Rajmund Nohl attila.r.nohl@REDACTED
Thu Oct 28 21:54:19 CEST 2010

2010/10/28, Thomas Lindgren <thomasl_erlang@REDACTED>:
> Well, Erlang was intended to be easy to learn and use, and these products
> have
> had dozens or even hundreds of programmers working on them over many years.
> It's
> pretty natural, isn't it?

On the other hand I think this is true for nearly all programming
languages, the C/Java projects have similar turnabouts. By the way, I
had a colleague who has working on AXD, but he said he didn't wrote a
single line of new code, he just copied and pasted some earlier
written code - and was genuinely surprised that it worked.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list