[erlang-questions] hipe problems with R14B?

[Dan Kelley]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Kostis Sagonas <kostis@REDACTED> wrote:

>
> But, out of curiosity, is there really a need to have both binary_part/2
> and binary_part/3 as BIFs in the language?
>

I'm sure I'm the wrong person to answer this, but for me, I don't have a
need for both.  I changed over to binary_part/2 earlier, and that works just
fine.

Dan