[erlang-questions] Does Erlang Treat Everything Function?

[Henning Diedrich]

  Cool! Thanks! Yes, even though it may not be true. Bill would say it 
depends on your definition of "function", right.

(Rgh. Can't paste it into Erlang ISO Latin-1 source :-Darn.)

Henning

黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang) wrote:
> Really? Even if it's not actually true that Erlang treats everything
> function?
>
> OK. I tried writing that
>
>           萬事萬物皆為函數
>
> "Everything is function."
>
> :D
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Henning Diedrich <hd2010@REDACTED>wrote:
>
>   
>> :-) How is that written in Chinese? I'd like to use that as a motto.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Henning
>>
>>
>> 黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang) wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hi, Erlang-lovers! I'm writing Erlang tutorials in my local
>>> language, Chinese. I felt in thinking about a word
>>> "Everything is functions."
>>> Could I say that Erlang realizes the word too?
>>> That is, to say even if a term is number, it's also a function:
>>> for example, 0 is a function 0/0. Is it right?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> YHH.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>   

-- 
*Henning Diedrich*
CEO


	
	Eonblast Corporation
hdiedrich@REDACTED
+1.404.418.5002 w
www.eonblast.com


This email contains confidential and/or privileged information. If you 
are not the intended recipient (or have received this email in error) 
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any 
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this 
email is prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20100517/474b7579/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4856 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20100517/474b7579/attachment.png>