[erlang-questions] Current state of packaged modules: net.rtmp.decoder

[Jayson Vantuyl]

+1

Sent from my iPhone

On May 11, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Nicholas Frechette <zeno490@REDACTED>  
wrote:

> I would like to know as well as I enjoy working with them.
> Simplifies naming greatly when one isn't afraid of naming collisions.
> Moreover, I suspect that people that do encounter collisions, will  
> use a
> prefix/suffix to deal with it, in a similar way to prefixing package  
> name
> with '.'.
>
> Erlang would benefit greatly from a stable and officially supported
> namespace/package system for modules. IMO, I've been quite happy  
> with the
> current state of things with package prefix.
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED>  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I can't understand why is not recommended now to use packages of
>> modules. What is bad in
>> using dotted names? What is the future of this feature: it will be
>> developed or it will be deprecated?
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
>> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-questions-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>>
>>