[erlang-questions] Processes memory

Marcel Meyer marcel.meyer@REDACTED
Fri May 7 15:49:52 CEST 2010


Thank you for the quick response.

@James, setting the shell to results(0) worked, thank you!
@Robert, I tried the "test:perm("processese"), 42." trick but it did not
work. I saw that only 42 was returned but the memory dump still showed
allocation. Thanks for your help though!

Regards,
Marcel

On 7 May 2010 09:29, James Hague <james.hague@REDACTED> wrote:

> > The "processes*" have increased significantly.
> > I did not bind the result of that computation, so why is it still
> consuming
> > resources?
>
> The results of previous expressions are saved in the shell, so you can
> refer to them with the v(N) command, where N is the entry in the
> history list. You can change how many results are saved with
> resullts(N). Both of these commands are in the shell help: help().
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-questions-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>
>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list