[erlang-questions] thoughts on rebar bundled with Erlang/OTP

Edmond Begumisa ebegumisa@REDACTED
Wed Dec 1 15:08:25 CET 2010

 From your suggestion, it appears to me that the problem you are trying to  
address is awareness. i.e. people don't know that tools like rebar/sinan  
exist and either re-invent the wheel or suffer silently.

Perhaps a special section on erlang.org could address this. A page devoted  
to 3rd party developer tools with categories like IDEs, packaging, etc.  
Tool developers could then fill out a form with a summarised description  
of their tool, the type of license and a link to their repository then  
post it under the relevant category. Something like the current links page  
(http://www.erlang.org/links.html) but less general, more descriptive and  

- Edmond -

On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:07:03 +1100, Chad DePue <chad@REDACTED>  

> With every Erlang app Inaka has produced, the first step when telling a
> client how to deploy is "Go to Basho's Mercurial Repository and download
> Rebar". I which makes me think it would be great as part of the standard
> Erlang/OTP distribution. I know you could make the argument that sinan  
> would
> be an equally valid candidate. Perhaps they're not mutually exclusive.
>  Either way, Rebar does make building apps easier. Any thoughts?

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list