[erlang-questions] Inconsistent catch behaviour
Thu Jun 18 10:58:17 CEST 2009
----- "Kostis Sagonas" <kostis@REDACTED> wrote:
> Ulf Wiger has already answered this question, but I want to ask a
> different one. Why should one bother these days with catch (even
> mention it on this mailing list) when try-catch is available?
Because QuickCheck doesn't handle throws yet. I just needed a quick fix to induce a bad match in my test case.
More information about the erlang-questions