[erlang-questions] Re: Unicast 20k messages, $500-$1000 bounty

[Joel Reymont]

On Jul 16, 2009, at 4:35 PM, Paulo Sérgio Almeida wrote:

> I don't know what deliveery semantics you aim for, but now you don't  
> have total order in message delivery even for the same topic. As the  
> sending is in a spawned proc, two clients can receive two msgs A and  
> B from the same topic one in the order A -> B and the other B -> A.  
> As you already have middleman, why not do the sending without  
> spawning a proc?

You are right, I'll fix this!

---
Mac hacker with a performance bent
http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont