[erlang-questions] Re: ets traversal time

[Joel Reymont]

On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:45 AM, ttmrichter@REDACTED wrote:

> I am. The first one is taking a little under 10% less time and the  
> second one over 50% less time over the original foldr version. This  
> isn't much of a difference?


You are right. I was hoping to see a drastic difference, though. That  
original 2s is more of an outlier.

---
Mac hacker with a performance bent
http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont