[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?

damien morton dmorton@REDACTED
Tue Nov 18 02:07:31 CET 2008

There is a proposal on the next(erlang) Google Moderator site:

 "arbitrarily deep hierarchies of modules [with name-space protection
for functions], instead of a flat global module names"

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:56 AM, damien morton <dmorton@REDACTED> wrote:
> I tried this using filenames "foo.bar.erl" and importing them - and it
> throws an error currently, so it wouldnt break any code to do this.
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Vance Shipley <vances@REDACTED> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:32:17AM +0100, Robert Virding wrote:
>> }  What do you mean by packages?
>> The namespace packages.  I recall seeing the libraries stuffed
>> into packages to group things like maybe erlang.bif:link/1.
>>        -Vance

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list