[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?

Kevin Scaldeferri kevin@REDACTED
Sun Nov 16 19:45:28 CET 2008

On Nov 16, 2008, at 9:25 AM, damien morton wrote:

> 2008/11/17 Robert Virding <rvirding@REDACTED>
> Syntax is another problem, maybe practically even more difficult,  
> but in one respect actually not too difficult. The main point is  
> that the syntax and the semantics must "fit together" and support  
> each other. This is one reason why I am not too keen on using a C/ 
> Java like syntax, it was designed for completely different semantics.
> More thoughts later,
> Another correspondent pointed out that the scope of the changes in  
> Perl 6 is provoking Shock and Awe is some of Perl community - the  
> changes are so extensive that the language is barely recognisable.

*looks around*

Did someone say that?  Because I don't think I said that...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20081116/e0d7c4e1/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list