[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?

[Robert Virding]

Also I forgot to mention that perhaps it should be called Erlang 2011
because I don't really want to wait until the year 3000 to see it. Or just
perhaps Erlang2 and drop the pseudo years which never hold anyway.

Robert again
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20081115/911e1521/attachment.htm>