[erlang-questions] gen_tcp:recv and hairloss, one resolution

[Pablo Polvorin]

hi,

> and then I call recv in each state function, which might sound messy but
> it looks pretty clean actually, and now
> each state can decide how to handle streaming of data.

looks like you might be better using the socket in {active,once} mode?


>
> It solves the socket ownership problem also since sync_send_event must
> not be spawning a new process like
> send_event does.

No, none of these function spawns a new process. Both are intended to
communicate
with an already existing process (a gen_fsm )


> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>