[erlang-questions] Side-effects in "if" guards
Per Melin
per.melin@REDACTED
Thu May 15 21:18:20 CEST 2008
2008/5/15 Darren New <dnew@REDACTED>:
> Rather than the more straightforward
> if X is a list andalso string:tolower(X) = X
> andalso len(X) = 5 andalso true = my:noduplicates(X) -> good;
A check that involved should probably be factored into its own function anyway.
foo(X) ->
case is_string_ok(X) of
true -> good;
false -> bad
end.
is_string_ok(X) ->
is_list(X) andalso length(X) == 5 andalso
string:tolower(X) == X andalso my:no_duplicates(X).
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list