[erlang-questions] [erlang-bugs] Weird pg2 behavior
Rick Pettit
rpettit@REDACTED
Thu May 8 08:44:25 CEST 2008
On Wed, May 7, 2008 9:28 pm, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Has there been any progress on this? This bug bit us again today. :-(
>
> (A pid from a node on a machine that had been decommissioned and not
> running any Erlang code for months now but still present on our
> network was still lurking in one of our pg2 groups. Yesterday we
> finally repurposed this machine, removing it from our network, which
> had the unexpected side effect of causing Pid ! Msg in some heavily
> used code to start adding several seconds of delay due to the runtime
> attempting to autoconnect to that long-dead node.)
Is there a complete list of currently known pg2 bugs published someplace
(besides this email thread), perhaps with suggested work arounds until a
new pg2 can be released?
In my case hot loading of all modules which contain client code performing
pg2 lookups is an option, so I have a chance to avoid disaster (as
described by Matthew above) if I act fast :-)
-Rick
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Matthew Dempsky <matthew@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Hans Bolinder
>>
>> <hans.bolinder@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>> > I think pg2 should monitor all pids rather than link to local pids
>> > only. Carefully setting up monitors, like Global does since R11B-4,
>> > should work.
>>
>> Sounds good to me. Can we hope to see this in R12B-3? :-)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list