Ulf Wiger wrote:
>
> h(X) ->
> Y = case X of
> a ->
> {a}
> b ->
> {b}
> end
> Y
Granted I've not read Okasaki's blog,
but why would you have the above
instead of:
h(X) ->
Y = case X of
a ->
{a}
b ->
{b}
end
Y
Kostis