[erlang-questions] Distributed erlang problem
Chandru
chandrashekhar.mullaparthi@REDACTED
Wed Mar 19 10:54:47 CET 2008
I am having a hard time figuring out how to get a few nodes to talk to each
other within certain rules. See figure below. Each box is a separate
physical server. The small boxes inside each big box are LAN cards.
+------------------+ +------------------+
| +--+ +--+ |
| db1@REDACTED | |........| | db1@REDACTED |
| +--+ +--+ |
| +-oam--+ | | +-oam-+ |
+----+--+---+------+ +-------+--+--+----+
| |
| |
| |
| |
| +-------------------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
+------+ OMC ....|
| |
| |
+-------------------+
I've got two database nodes on two hosts, each of which have two LAN cards.
One set of LAN cards are called the replication interfaces; they connect via
a special LAN which is very low latency and high bandwidth. This is used for
mnesia replication. To enable this, I start the DB nodes with the -sname
parameter set to 'db1@REDACTED'.
Now there is a separate OMC node which should talk to the DB nodes via
distributed erlang on another set of interfaces. The problem is that the
'host1-rep' interface is not reachable from the OMC host (due to security
issues). Only the 'host1-oam' interface is reachable. But, on the OMC node,
'db1@REDACTED' is an unknown node.
It seems that I need a feature where an erlang node on a machine can be
reached via multiple names, such as 'db1@REDACTED', 'db1@REDACTED', '
db1@REDACTED, but I doubt this capability exists.
Any suggestions? Anyone else had similar issues to deal with?
regards,
Chandru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20080319/d2ce4f8a/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list