[erlang-questions] erlang sucks
Mon Mar 17 13:20:06 CET 2008
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Rick Pettit wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:41:10AM +0000, Alp?r J?ttner wrote:
>>> Maybe it is due to the fact that most of them know C/C++/Java/Python.
>>> Maybe Erlang syntax is not so intuitive and easy as one could expect
>>> from a modern and powerful languages.
>>> Maybe because the standard library is not so rich and not so
>>> consistent as expected from a mature language.
>> I cannot agree with it. I grew up in the C/C++ world and also had known
>> Python before I met Erlang, still I find it very intuitive. I'm also
>> _very_ impressed by the simplicity and the expressive power. (I'm not a
>> student though...)
>> I think, the major obstacle for newcomers is not the syntax, but the
>> immutable data structures, the impossibility of variable rebinding, and
> These "features" make it much easier to write buggy code (and much harder to
> find such buggy code). The developers you speak of need to take off their
> blinders if they ever hope to see the light.
I don't think that immutable variables make it easier to write less
buggier code. On the contrary, I often see code like this:
Then someone adds a line to modify the HugeRecord and forgets to update
the call to 'g':
Now we have a stupid bug.
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
More information about the erlang-questions