[erlang-questions] erlang sucks
Thu Mar 13 08:41:03 CET 2008
Out of interest:
Does anybody know of _anything_ that has been removed, ever?
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:53 +0100, Mats Cronqvist wrote:
> Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Mats Cronqvist
> > <mats.cronqvist@REDACTED <mailto:mats.cronqvist@REDACTED>> wrote:
> > or are you saying there is a need for several 'and'? in that case i
> > disagree.
> > ...
> > I think there is no way to change it, because if you remove 'andalso'
> > and use 'and' in programmers manner lazy behaviour, you will break
> > some legacy code a vice versa. This change is impossible. You can be
> > not agree with it. You can argue against it, but it is all what you
> > can do with it.
> if you go back a few posts, you'll see that i try to make it very
> clear that nothing will be removed (at least not for the next few years).
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions