[erlang-questions] EEP9 new version
Fredrik Svahn
fredrik.svahn@REDACTED
Wed Mar 12 08:27:26 CET 2008
I seem to have slipped on the keyboard when writing the mail.
binary_string it is.
BR /Fredrik
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Bengt Kleberg
<bengt.kleberg@REDACTED> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The existing module is called 'string' (not strings). Perhaps you do
> want binary_string but mistyped it as binary_strings below?
>
>
> bengt
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 20:30 +0100, Fredrik Svahn wrote:
> > A new version of EEP9 is available.
> >
> > In this version I have split the functionality into three parts as per
> > popular demand. A binary_strings module (interface compatible with
> > strings, although some extras added), a binary module (for non-string
> > binaries) and a regexp module (yet to be named, for backwards
> > compatibility it will probably need to exist in parallel with the
> > old).
> >
> > http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0009.html
> >
> > I am also hoping that someone is willing to step up and take the lead
> > for an EEP on unicode support as I believe this is to big to be in
> > this eep. Better many small EEPs than one huge.
> >
> > BR /Fredrik
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list