[erlang-questions] Erlang Syntax - again

Richard A. O'Keefe ok@REDACTED
Tue Mar 11 22:19:59 CET 2008

On 11 Mar 2008, at 10:02 pm, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
> But what I would like to have in Erlang is definitely better  
> introspection /
> reflection capabilities. I would like to have records as runtime  
> structures,

Joe Armstrong and I have independently come up with essentially the same
proposal, which is essentially the same thing as LIFE's psi-terms and as
a data type whose name I forget in IBM Prolog.  Given that these things
have been implemented in those two languages, and given my outline of  
to implement them, we KNOW it can be done, and it can be done with  
effiency.  People keep on asking for it.  I'm busy this week, but next  
I might have time to reformat my proposal as an EEP.  If you are reading
this, Joe, do you want to do a rival EEP, or should we merge our  

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list