[erlang-questions] [erlang-patches] Running mnesia across a firewall
Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
ulf.wiger@REDACTED
Wed Mar 5 13:26:16 CET 2008
Serge Aleynikov skrev:
> Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote:
>> Serge Aleynikov skrev:
>>>
>>> The main culprit is the net_kernel's dist_auto_connect option that is
>>> an all or none setting that cannot vary depending on connecting
>>> attempt to a given node. The attached patch (for R12B-1) solves this
>>> issue by introducing an additional kernel option:
>>>
>>> {dist_auto_connect, {callback, M, F}}
>>
>> Have you thought about solving it with an application that
>> periodically tries calling net_kernel:connect(Node)?
>
> On which node, though? If this is one of the "master" nodes A holding a
> disk copy of a table X, then the node must have {dist_auto_connect,
> once} set. If the firewall prohibits inbound access to this node A from
> some other node C that uses remote mnesia interface to access table X,
> then the only way to establish connection to node C is to do on node A
> net_kernel:connect(C). However if that connection drops, there's no way
> to reestablish that connection without restarting node A. Remember that
> in case of {dist_auto_connect, once} net_kernel checks if a connection
> is barred and if it is it won't allow to connect to a node that
> previously was connected.
Correction 1: It's net_kernel:connect_node(Node). My bad.
Correction 2: net_kernel:connect_node/1 ignores the value of
dist_auto_connect
What we've done is to keep a "maintenance channel" (not distr Erlang),
over which we can negotiate which node should restart.
BR,
Ulf W
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list