[erlang-questions] Use of makefiles
Tue Mar 4 17:57:08 CET 2008
Is it not also the case that perl is more standard than make?
I know very little of perl, but have fought at least 4 different kinds
of make (files).
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 10:11 -0600, James Hague wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Steve Vinoski <vinoski@REDACTED> wrote:
> > Hi Joe, I agree with you 100%. Give me emacs (with its vast emacs-lisp
> > extensibility), bash (or ksh), and various UNIX command-line tools,
> > which I can combine as I wish using pipes, and keep the visual tools
> > out of my way (and out of my RAM).
> I think this discussion has been misinterpreted :) No one is arguing
> for IDE-like features over makefiles.
> I have found that I don't need makefiles for my Erlang projects. I
> either recompile the same module repeatedly or I want to rebuild
> everything. The former is business as usual. The latter is easily
> done with a shell script, Perl script, or short Erlang program. I use
> makefiles infrequently enough that I always forget the syntax and
> nuances of using them. But I can bang out a Perl program that does
> the same thing--even checking file modification dates and so on--in
> very little time. It's more flexible than using a makefile, too, and
> usually ends up being less "code."
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions