[erlang-questions] fyi: Google protocol buffers
Thu Jul 10 12:51:08 CEST 2008
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562@REDACTED> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:41 PM, ERLANG <erlangy@REDACTED> wrote:
>> But why not spend some time on more interesting idea : a C full (UBF A/B/C),
>> open implementation of UBF?
>> Universal Binary Format (UBF) is really worth a try:
> I looked at UBF a long time ago and I thought it was a very
> interesting idea. What I was wondering is why there seems to have been
> so little apparent interest in this (i.e. why hasn't it transitioned
> from the POC).
I started posting a reply to this - but it became a blog entry
> As I said earlier in the thread, I don't think that Google's idea is
> particularly new.
> The advantage I see in terms of integrating Erlang with other
> languages is that there seems to be a budding community of people
> writing implementations in other languages. I think this would be a
> good thing to piggyback off.
> erlang-questions mailing list
[Kopia av detta meddelande skickas till FRA för övervakningsändamål.
De vill ju ändå läsa min e-post.]
[A copy of this mail has been sent to
FRA for monitoring purposes. FRA wants to read all my e-mail and have
been allowed to do by the Swedish parliment - in violation of article
12 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights]
More information about the erlang-questions