[erlang-questions] Strings as Lists
Fri Feb 22 21:22:21 CET 2008
Taj -- thank you for the example of literal-string quoting from Lua!
Seems an interesting yet simple approach.
Richard -- re: your last post on this subject, which I found quite
illuminating as well...
A syntax for literal string declarations is, by definition, syntactic
sugar. It's not making the core language more expressive. It's for
improving the human-machine interface in specific situations. Since
usability is really the goal, then your first-and-foremost requirement
is to... make it usable in those situations. Syntactic power (nesting
multiple syntaxes) is *very nice*, but should be a distinctly
As you said, no one quoting character sequence will suffice for _all_
situations. In the case of multi-line strings, approaches we've seen
1) Define a framework, have the framework know (and hide) the
appropriate terminating char-sequence
2) Let the user define a terminating char sequence. (Perl/PHP/Ruby's
3) Have one terminating multi-line char sequence. (Python's answer)
4) Have one char-sequence, but permit its length to vary to allow
nesting, within reason. (Lua's answer)
Richard, from your last post:
> Literal_String = """
> Here is `'"\$^some literal text with an embedded
> but no trailing newline
> Another = ""!He said "Foo!" But that was not the end!!""
That example falls into camp (2), user-defined terminating char, yes?
I suppose the motivation for (3) or (4) could be, perhaps, a desire to
make the string-enclosing syntax consistent, thus making it easier to
read unfamiliar code. The reader doesn't have to guess (or look
carefully for) what terminating-sequence the author chose. (4)
encourages consistency while still permitting nesting.
As I said before, I think nesting is a nice, not necessary, property.
I presume you won't consider anything a "solution" unless it _is_
Comparing (1) and (2), I believe the programmer who's writing the code
is best-positioned to decide what's an appropriate terminating
sequence. I think hiding the terminating sequence behind a name ("/
xml", "/latex", "/url") is likely to cause bugs, or at least weird
And.. we haven't discussed "raw" strings for regexes. Doh!
Joe's original proposal was:
> ~n"...." turn off quoting
> ~r"...." string is a regexp
> ~x"..." string is xml
> ~x/FlunkyStuff ... FunkyStuff (string is xml terminated by
> ~myExpander/FunkyStuff .... FunckyStuff
Richard, which parts of this seem especially troublesome, and which
(IMO, seems like a combination of camps (1) and (2) per above...)
On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Taj Khattra wrote:
>> Perhaps if we
>> say that a literal string begins with n+2 quotation marks and a
>> single character
>> that is not a letter, digit, space, or tab, and then ends with
>> another copy of
>> that single character followed by n+2 quotation marks.
> here's an excerpt from http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#2.1
> specifying how literal strings can be defined in Lua:
> Literal strings can also be defined using a long format enclosed by
> long brackets. We define an opening long bracket of level n as an
> opening square bracket followed by n equal signs followed by another
> opening square bracket. So, an opening long bracket of level 0 is
> written as [[, an opening long bracket of level 1 is written as [=[,
> and so on. A closing long bracket is defined similarly; for instance,
> a closing long bracket of level 4 is written as ]====]. A long string
> starts with an opening long bracket of any level and ends at the first
> closing long bracket of the same level. Literals in this bracketed
> form may run for several lines, do not interpret any escape sequences,
> and ignore long brackets of any other level. They may contain anything
> except a closing bracket of the proper level.
> erlang-questions mailing list
kangas@REDACTED – www.p16blog.com
More information about the erlang-questions