[erlang-questions] erlang api documentation

[Frank Blecha]

Maybe we should refocus on documentation instead of javascript?

On 10/25/07, Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> As a general rule I agree.  Links should be links.
>
> On 10/25/07, Daniel Luna <luna@REDACTED> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Kenneth Lundin wrote:
> > > I have plans to improve the doc's in the direction you ask for. I am
> > > also considering using Javascript in a similar way as used in the
> > > previously mentioned http://gotapi.com. But I think it is still a
> > > requirement that the doc's can be downloaded and browsed locally
> without
> > > the need for having a web-server running. I think it would be ok to
> > > require a browser with javascript capabilities (we already require
> > > javascript when it comes to links between applications)
> >
> > And this javascript is actually quite irritating for me. I quite often
> > wish to open links in a new tab, but when the link is a javscript
> thingie
> > I only get an empty tab when I middle-click.
> >
> > Please don't use them in the future version.
> >
> > /Luna
> > --
> > Daniel Luna                           | Top reasons that I have a beard:
> > luna@REDACTED                     |  a) Laziness.
> > http://www.update.uu.se/~luna/        |  b) I can.
> > Don't look at my homepage (it stinks).|  c) I can get away with it.
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



-- 
Frank Blecha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20071025/d79c9b4b/attachment.htm>