[erlang-questions] ThinkingParallel interview

[Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt]

Hm. I'm running into this from time to time. And this time I am really
interested in this.

However ubf seems to be no longer supported/developed. I doesn't even
compile as it has syntax errors in, for example, contract_lex.erl file

I wonder if anyone (or may be Joe Armstrong himself ;) ) could continue
work on UBF...

Christian S wrote:
> Have you seen this work? :
> http://www.sics.se/~joe/ubf/site/home.html
>
> On 3/21/07, Adam Langley <agl@REDACTED> wrote:
>   
>> But would you mind elaborating on what you had in mind when you spoke
>> of first-class protocols and a contracts system for them. Are you
>> thinking of a type-system for protocols? If so, how do you see it
>> working?
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20070322/2fc7da6c/attachment.htm>