[erlang-questions] erlang in Air Traffic Management ?
Vance Shipley
vances@REDACTED
Thu Mar 8 23:08:59 CET 2007
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:54:03AM +0100, Dominic Williams wrote:
}
} The real problem is that the industry is very conservative,
} and there is great informal pressure not to do things any
} differently from how they've been done in the past. There is
} even a holy principle, whose name I forget, which is in the
} standards, and basically means: we guarantee this is as
} safe as (i.e. not worse than) previously designed systems.
The Federal Aviation Authority in the US apparently follows no
such tenant. I was apalled at what I uncovered when looking
into the 2004 air traffic control outage(*). Apparently the
"Voice Switching and Control System" linking pilots to controllers
on the ground was "upgraded"(+) from a control subsystem using
Tandem Himalaya Non-Stop computers to Microsoft Windows 2000.
-Vance
(*) http://www.cnn.com/2004/TRAVEL/09/14/lax.stoppage/
(+) http://nas-architecture.faa.gov/nas/mechanism/mech_data.cfm?mid=2460
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list