[erlang-questions] Erlang vs. Stackless Python
Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
Fri Aug 3 18:34:17 CEST 2007
Well, sure. The ring benchmark serializes all processes,
which means that there is practically no parallelism in
There's a similar benchmark, called big.erl (big bang),
where a thousand or so processes are created, and all
start talking to everyone else.
It gives excellent speedup on SMP Erlang.
That might be another good benchmark to try in other
[mailto:erlang-questions-bounces@REDACTED] On Behalf Of tsuraan
Sent: den 3 augusti 2007 18:07
To: Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt
Cc: Zac Brown; erlang-questions@REDACTED
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Erlang vs. Stackless Python
An interesting result was that the -smp flag caused erlang to
slow down for that test. Should that ever happen?
On 03/08/07, Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt <dmitriid@REDACTED> wrote:
Zac Brown wrote:
> That benchmark has some pitfalls in that it doesn't
really demonstrate the
> scalabilty of erlang that well. I feel confident
saying that erlang would
> scale to a much larger scale far better than stackless
> Interesting post no doubt, but could've been a little
Indeed. There's a longish discussion on hat in the
comments. It looks
like erlang is unbeatable still :)
erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions