[erlang-questions] R11B-1 on Solaris 10

Chandru chandrashekhar.mullaparthi@REDACTED
Wed Oct 25 13:55:05 CEST 2006


On 25/10/06, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:24:20 +0100, Chandru <
> chandrashekhar.mullaparthi@REDACTED> wrote:
> > We tried building 64-bit R11B-1 on a AMD Opteron platform running
> Solaris
> > 10. The only way we could get it to build was by changing line 1352 in
> > erts/configure to:
> >
> > i86pc)  ARCH=amd64;;
> >
> > It seems that 'uname -p' returns i386 instead of x86_64 under Solaris
> 10.
>
> I see that Solaris' `man uname` describes -p as preferred over -m, but
> they fail to mention that uname -p is functionally inferior to -m.
>
> In any case, what does `uname -a`, `isalist`, and `optisa `isalist``
> report on Solaris 10 on AMD64?


Small correction to what Peter posted.

# optisa `isalist`
amd64


cheers
Chandru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20061025/ace7248c/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list