bug in timer:sleep/1 smp implementation (R11B-0)
Mikael Pettersson
mikpe@REDACTED
Thu Jun 15 18:28:27 CEST 2006
Dmitriy Kargapolov writes:
>
> When running erl with -smp +S 2 option, sometimes process gets stuck in
> timer:sleep/1.
> Process code looks like:
>
> some_receiver(State) ->
> NewState = receive
> % legal packet
> {some_keyword, Address, Port, Packet} ->
> State1 = handle_packet(Address, Port, Packet, State),
> timer:sleep(get_loop_delay()),
> State1;
> % unknown message
> _ ->
> State
> end,
> some_receiver(NewState).
>
> Delay value varies in range 1..999
>
> Since timer:sleep/1 implemented as:
> sleep(T) ->
> receive
> after T -> ok
> end.
> it seems to be problem with "after" in smp implementation in R11B-0
>
> I don't have more details yet but will continue testing.
> My platform: 2.6.9-5.ELsmp #1 SMP i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Interesting. Please send us a small standalone module that exhibits
the bug, and I'll see if I can reproduce it.
/Mikael
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list