Lazy recursive list comprehensions

[Joel Reymont]

On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:

> On the other hand, if the lazyness would be hidden somehow in a  
> library,
> then the use of it could still be elegant. There would be no  
> comprehensions,
> but that's not a big deal.

This was a huge deal for me yesterday when I tried a non- 
comprehension version of trans. Couldn't get it to work. Can you show  
me what it would look like?

	Thanks, Joel

--
http://wagerlabs.com/