Storing pids

Joel Reymont joelr1@REDACTED
Thu Jan 5 13:54:32 CET 2006

True, true. How about {erlang:phash2(self()), self()} then, where the  
hash is used for lookup and the pid can then be used for anything  
else... so long as the original node is still up?

On Jan 5, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Mats Cronqvist wrote:

>   granted. but what if you see something funny in the log, and the  
> target node is still up? then you'd want to connect to is and do a  
> process_info() or something, right?


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list