How to find out what's going on
Joel Reymont
joelr1@REDACTED
Wed Jan 4 01:46:22 CET 2006
Why would throughput be better with synchronous logging as opposed to
asynchronous?
I'm afraid of tracing becoming a bottleneck if I make it synchronous,
sort of like a lock that only lets one process through. Maybe my
fears are unfounded, though.
Also, how do I get hold of the disk_log pid to inspect the message
queue length? I found pid2name(Pid) -> {ok, Log} | undefined but
don't see a name2pid(Name) -> {ok, Pid}.
On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:10 AM, Sean Hinde wrote:
> Try with disk_log:log instead and see if you get the same result.
> From what I have seen in the past the throughput under full load
> will increase dramatically - especially if combined with emulator
> thread pool (erl +A 10).
>
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list