[erlang-questions] edoc questions

[Michael McDaniel]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:14:00PM +0100, Fredrik Thulin wrote:
> Michael McDaniel wrote:
> >   first question, please see below ...
> ...
> 
> >>     How can I preserve the explanatory text for Dst?
> 
> Hi
> 
> Can you please be more specific? At the linked page, I found functions 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Please look back at my original post.  I commented your function.
  Other than the misplaced @author tag I, the tags compile and keep
  your explanatory text verbatim.

%% @doc
%% <pre>
%%
%% all Fredrik's comments
%%
%% </pre>
%% @end


~M

> with edoc specifications like this one :
> 
>    %@spec
>    % go_b() -> {ok, Response}
> 
> However, none of them seems to include a textual explanation of Response.
> 
> /Fredrik
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 
> !DSPAM:52,45743b7074991232720925!
> 
> 

-- 
Michael McDaniel
Portland, Oregon, USA
http://autosys.us
+1 503 283 5284