EUnit 2.0 alpha testers wanted

Vlad Dumitrescu vlad_dumitrescu@REDACTED
Wed Apr 19 22:49:54 CEST 2006

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Carlsson" <richardc@REDACTED>
>> One simple way would be to have a ?_message(Format, [Terms]) that in the
>> simplest form translates to an io:format call, but not necessarily.
> I think I see now. You want a standard way of inserting _new_ "debugging
> printouts" (or breadcrumbs or whatever you might want to call them), and
> not merely handle existing printouts (perhaps enabled by defining DEBUG
> in a makefile) in existing code. Interesting. I'll have to think about it.

Exactly! It's my usual method of debugging.

> PS. Oh, by the way, I've just fixed the I/O redirection thing. Had to
> find a good way of collecting the output and associating it with the
> corresponding test (even when a single process runs several tests),
> but it could actually be done in a very nice way with minimal overhead.

Cool, it will be interesting to check out.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list