Compiler backwards compatibility
Vlad Dumitrescu XX (LN/EAB)
Tue Sep 6 15:55:21 CEST 2005
Okay, I checked these options, but 'r7' is a little too strong, as I need some of the features in any case.
What options should I use in order to get R9 compatibility? The current complaint is for opcode 112, which should mean I have to use no_new_apply, but are there more?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED
> [mailto:owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED]On Behalf Of Bjorn
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:15 PM
> To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: Re: Compiler backwards compatibility
> While not officially supported, we have some options we use for
> testing that should work:
> erlc +r7 file.erl
> erlc +no_new_binaries +no_new_apply file.erl
> "Vlad Dumitrescu XX (LN/EAB)"
> <vlad.xx.dumitrescu@REDACTED> writes:
> > Hi,
> > Is the R10 compiler able to generate beam files that are
> R9-compatible? I don't use any of the new features, but the
> beam files contain opcodes that aren't supported on R9.
> > regards,
> > Vlad
> Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions