principle of least surprise
Tue Nov 22 10:35:20 CET 2005
Nick Linker <xlcr@REDACTED> wrote:
> >Better than nothing of course, but wouldn't it be great to fix this
> >mis-feature and make the language better?
> Hm, what, in your opinion, about the possibility to be an arbitrary
> function (returning true or false, of course) in guards? Will it make
> the language better?
Maybe I should have added "and more consistent". Anyway I think
arbitrary functions in guards is an orthogonal question. Personally I
think it would be nice but it's not that big deal.
More information about the erlang-questions