An "is_string" BIF?
Thomas Johnsson XA (LN/EAB)
thomas.xa.johnsson@REDACTED
Thu Mar 10 09:21:36 CET 2005
This really exposes an ugly wart on the language, in that
one cannot use any expression in a guard, making it impossible
to use abstractions there, e.g.
glorbgraph(Graph) when mygraph:curiousproperty(Graph) -> ...
-- Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED
[mailto:owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED]On Behalf Of Corrado Santoro
Sent: den 10 mars 2005 09:02
To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
Subject: An "is_string" BIF?
Dear all,
I need an "is_string" function, something that behaves as follows:
is_string ("ABC") -> true
is_string ([65,66,67]) -> true
is_string (['1','2',three]) -> false
...
I know that I could do that by defining a suitable function, but I would
like to use it in a guard. Is there a sort of BIF?
Cheers,
--Corrado
--
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list